Supplied sterile
The current Polyester Knit Mop records identify separate sterile part numbers. Treat the part number, package and release documentation as the unit of review.
Sterile mop selection
Review the exact sterile configuration, incoming presentation and transfer workflow before requesting an evaluation sample. Sterile supply status is configuration-specific; it is not a universal claim about every mop in a product family.
Why sterile presentation matters
A sterile presentation affects incoming packaging, storage, transfer, opening and post-use handling. It does not by itself prove cleaning performance, frame compatibility, particle performance or suitability for a particular Grade A/B operation.
Start with the point-of-use requirement and the site contamination-control procedure. Then identify the exact part number and request the documents needed by QA, validation and procurement.
Decision boundary
Supplied sterile, sterilizable and non-sterile are different workflow decisions. Confirm the exact SKU and presentation before standardizing a mop.
Read sterile vs non-sterile guidance →Status language
The current Polyester Knit Mop records identify separate sterile part numbers. Treat the part number, package and release documentation as the unit of review.
The listed sterile rows record gamma irradiation and double-layer vacuum-sealed packaging. Dose, SAL, expiry and storage limits are not published in the current evidence set.
A process-capability statement does not make a product supplied sterile. Non-sterile rows and reusable configurations require their own site procedure and configuration review.
Buyer review
Record the part number, nominal size, nominal weight, construction and sterile status. Do not transfer sterile-row packaging wording to a non-sterile row.
Define outer-package inspection, storage, transfer, opening point, waste handling and any disinfection steps required by the site procedure.
Confirm usable frame width, attachment geometry, reach, clearance and the surfaces included in the cleaning route.
Use the listed construction as a starting point. Pickup, retention, release, coverage and particle/lint performance require configuration-specific evidence.
Request the applicable specification, packaging information, sterilization or release record and lot traceability for the selected configuration.
Evaluate fit, handling, liquid pickup and release, workflow suitability and package handling with the intended frame and route.
Verified public records
The current public evidence set confirms the following sterile rows. They are candidates for site evaluation, not universal Grade A/B approvals.
| Part number | Nominal size | Nominal weight | Construction | Packaging / sterilization | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MID-MOP-PK-40G-S | 40 cm × 12 cm | 40 g (±10%) | 4-layer, 100% polyester knit | Double-layer vacuum sealed; gamma irradiated; carton quantity: 100 | Evaluate → |
| MID-MOP-PK-55G-S | 40 cm × 12 cm | 55 g (±10%) | 5-layer, 100% polyester knit | Double-layer vacuum sealed; gamma irradiated; carton quantity: 100 | Evaluate → |
| MID-MOP-PK-65G-S | 40 cm × 12 cm | 65 g (±10%) | 5-layer, 100% polyester knit | Double-layer vacuum sealed; gamma irradiated; carton quantity: 100 | Evaluate → |
40 g / 55 g / 65 g
The current records list 40 g, 55 g and 65 g nominal-weight options, each with sterile and non-sterile rows. Weight and layer construction are configuration descriptors; the public evidence does not convert them into absorption, coverage or productivity results.
Read the 40 g vs 55 g vs 65 g guide →| Nominal weight | Listed construction | Status rows |
|---|---|---|
| 40 g (±10%) | 4-layer, 100% polyester knit | Sterile and non-sterile |
| 55 g (±10%) | 5-layer, 100% polyester knit | Sterile and non-sterile |
| 65 g (±10%) | 5-layer polyester construction | Sterile and non-sterile |
Documentation and qualification
Documentation availability is configuration-dependent. Ask for the records that match the selected part number, package and lot rather than treating a family-level page as a release document.
Sample evaluation
Use the intended frame, solution, route and representative surfaces. Record fit, handling, liquid pickup and release, change procedure, package handling and any open evidence items. Final suitability remains subject to the facility SOP, risk assessment and qualification process.
Next step
Share the intended area, sterile requirement, frame information and documentation needs. We can keep the discussion tied to the selected part number and evaluation workflow.